BrandlCreative
INDUSTRIES · LAW

Intake automation for law firms.
Built for compliance and clients.

For Australian law firms, solo practitioners, and barristers' chambers. We build the intake, qualification, and follow-up systems that capture every inquiry, route by matter type, and run conflict checks before you respond.

<24 hrs
every inquiry actioned within one business day
100%
of leads conflict-checked before response
Yours
every record stays in your firm's system
How it works

What lives on your stack.

Intake forms that qualify.
Captures matter type, jurisdiction, urgency, and conflict-check fields. Routes only qualified inquiries to a human reviewer.
Conflict check trigger.
New leads run against your existing client list before you respond. Compliance is the default, not a manual step.
Document chase automation.
Deadline reminders, missing-document follow-ups, e-signature nudges. The admin chase happens without your time on it.
Privacy-first by default.
All data stays in your firm's systems. AU hosting, no third-party model training, no offshore handling. Privilege respected.
AI-first · human-in-the-loop

AI runs the admin.
Lawyers run the matter.

AI never gives advice. AI drafts the documents that lawyers review, sign, and send. Cost agreements, intake summaries, chronologies, disclosure bundles. Hours of partner time saved on tasks that never billed properly anyway. Every word leaves the firm with a human signature.

01 · AI drafts · you sign off
Initial advice letter drafts.
First pass generated from intake data and matter type. The lawyer edits substance, signs off, and sends. AI never makes the call.
02 · AI drafts · you sign off
Cost agreement drafts.
Generated from your standard terms, populated with the matter specifics. You review the rates and scope. The client signs.
03 · AI drafts · you sign off
Document timelines and chronologies.
AI builds a chronology from emailed documents and metadata. The fee earner verifies before anything is filed or relied on.
04 · AI drafts · you sign off
Discovery and disclosure summaries.
AI summarises bundles, flags potential privilege, drafts schedules. The lawyer reviews everything before it leaves the firm.
Pain points we hear

Sound familiar?

Solo and small firms in Australia carry the same admin load as large firms with a fraction of the people. The pain points below show up across every firm we have audited.

01
Intake is unbillable time you cannot recover.
For solo and small firms, client intake on 15 new matters per month consumes nearly 20 hours of attorney time. Almost all unbillable.
Our fixAutomated intake forms route qualified inquiries with conflict-check fields ready. Attorney time drops to under 3 hours.
02
Conflicts checked late, or not at all.
Manual conflict checks delay first response by hours or days. A missed conflict is a compliance and revenue risk that should never have happened.
Our fixConflict-check trigger runs new leads against your existing client list before any response goes out. Compliance is the default.
03
First response is slow and the client notices.
Slow first response, inconsistent data capture, redundant info requests. The client's first impression of the firm is a frustrating one.
Our fixSame-day acknowledgement, intake completed within 24 hours. The lawyer engages with a qualified, conflict-cleared lead.
04
Document chase is admin work in legal clothes.
Outstanding documents, e-signatures pending, deadlines slipping. The fee earner becomes a chaser instead of a lawyer.
Our fixAutomated reminders, drafted as emails for review and send. The admin chase happens without partner time on it.
05
Cost agreements built from scratch every time.
Standard terms, populated manually, every matter. Hours of partner time on something that should be templated. Compliance risk if a clause is missed.
Our fixAI generates from your standard terms, populated with the matter specifics. You review, the client signs.
FAQ

Frequently asked

Is the intake automation compliant with Australian legal practice rules?
Yes. The agent runs intake forms and conflict checks but never gives advice. Every client communication still goes through a fee earner. AU data residency, audit-ready logs, no offshore handling.
How does conflict checking work?
Every new lead is checked against your existing client list before any response goes out. The match runs server-side and a flag is raised to the partner if there is any potential conflict. Compliance becomes the default rather than a manual step.
Will the AI write advice letters or discovery summaries?
It drafts them. The lawyer reviews, edits, and signs every word that leaves the firm. AI never makes the call. The time saving is on the unbillable hours (typing, formatting, document chase), not on the substance of the advice.
Can it integrate with our practice management system?
Yes. LEAP, Actionstep, Smokeball, Clio, and most other AU practice systems have APIs we can connect to. Intake data flows in, document drafts flow out, conflict checks happen in between.
Keep reading

Related

Use case
Internal Knowledge Assistant
Private AI trained on your firm's precedents, policies, and templates.
Read on →
Service
Connected Stack
Practice management + intake + conflict checking, wired with compliance in mind.
Read on →
Journal
Intake automation for small AU law firms
How solo and small firms are recovering 17 hours a month from intake admin.
Read on →